The business of academic consulting: Oxford’s journey and lessons

How can universities make academic consulting easier, safer, and more valuable?

In this episode, Jaci Barnett, Chief Operating Officer at Oxford University Innovation, explains how Oxford scopes projects, protects academics from risk, and connects consulting with research, licensing, and venture creation. She also sets out why fair incentives and academic integrity are essential to a credible service.

You can listen to the conversation on our podcast or read the summary below:

Also available on:

Summary

Academic consulting attracts less attention than patents, licences, and spin-outs, although it may be one of the most common ways university expertise reaches external organisations. Jaci Barnett, Chief Operating Officer at Oxford University Innovation, sees consulting as a practical route through which academics can solve immediate problems, understand the needs of industry and government, and establish relationships that may develop into research, teaching, or commercial opportunities.

Its value depends on how a university designs the service around it. Academics need clear boundaries, responsive support, sensible incentives, and protection from contractual and compliance risks. Clients need defined deliverables and confidence in the advice they receive. Oxford’s experience shows that consulting becomes strategically useful when the university supports those exchanges as part of a wider impact system and measures success beyond the fee from an individual project.

Impact provides the right purpose for consulting

Jaci defines academic consulting as the use of an academic’s expertise to help an external organisation solve a problem through advice. The client may be a company, public body, or another organisation. The work can involve an individual providing a few hours of guidance, a multidisciplinary team tackling a larger brief, or services that combine access to facilities with expert interpretation.

Oxford University Innovation has broadened its approach accordingly. Its consulting activity now includes tenders, project teams, and work outside the formal definition of research that still requires contracts and administrative support. One example involved statisticians from Oxford and other universities working with Ernst & Young on an assessment of test and trace.

Consultancy is a pathway to impact.

The pathway can lead in several directions. Consulting keeps academics close to external problems and can generate ideas for research or teaching. It may lead to publications, student opportunities, or a larger research collaboration. A contained assignment also helps the client assess whether an academic and their team have the expertise for a more substantial relationship.

This perspective also changes the business case. Consulting can produce income for academics and departments, yet Jaci cautions universities against treating it as a dependable source of institutional profit. Returns from knowledge commercialisation are uneven and difficult to predict. A narrow focus on revenue can encourage institutions to select only the largest apparent opportunities and overlook work with meaningful potential for impact.

Clear boundaries connect consulting with other routes

Consulting sits alongside research collaboration, licensing, and venture creation. These routes can overlap, so the correct choice depends on the client’s need and the nature of the proposed work. Oxford uses the Frascati definition to identify activity that constitutes research and directs those projects to research services.

The deliverable often clarifies the distinction. A consulting project provides defined advice, analysis, or another agreed output. Research allows greater uncertainty about what the investigation will find. Some proposals can be framed in different ways, making early scoping important for both the academic and the client.

Licensing becomes relevant when an external party needs direct access to intellectual property. An academic might use university software to analyse a client’s data and explain the results through consulting. If the client needs to operate the software independently, a licence is more appropriate. A spin-out may become necessary when activity grows to the point that it requires investment, employees, or a structure beyond the academic’s personal capacity.

The routes can also work together. Licensees may need consulting support to understand or develop a technology. Academic founders commonly advise their own spin-outs, and Oxford requires them to conduct that consulting through the university during the company’s first year so that conflicts of interest can be managed.

Consultancy is commercialisation of expertise.

Treating consulting as part of the wider knowledge exchange portfolio helps universities see these connections. A short assignment may remain self-contained, run beside a clinical trial, support a licensee, or create the trust required for a future research partnership.

A responsive service makes participation worthwhile

At Oxford, the academic usually brings an existing client relationship to Oxford University Innovation. The consulting team helps define the scope, records the deliverables, and establishes what the academic wants to receive financially. It then negotiates a fee that includes the service charge.

The contractual model places Oxford University Innovation between the client and the consultant. It contracts with the client and subcontracts the academic, limiting personal liability and reducing the chance that the academic or university will be pursued. The team also protects background intellectual property, checks compliance with relevant laws, handles invoicing, and chases payment.

We protect the university and the academic from a lot of that risk.

These safeguards matter because simple advice can create substantial exposure. An inexperienced consultant may sign away background knowledge, accept unsuitable liability, or breach export controls by carrying information or equipment into another country. Academic founders can also face conflicts when advising companies connected to their university work.

Departmental permission adds an internal check. Heads of department can assess whether consulting is compatible with an academic’s teaching and research workload and identify conflicts across several clients. Where a conflict exists, Oxford can put a management plan in place.

Speed and support determine whether academics see value in using the institutional route. Jaci’s team aims to examine contracts immediately, explain its red lines, and respond within days. It also coaches new consultants on the scope, likely questions, and information or materials that sit outside the assignment.

Incentives bring activity into view

Many academics already consult, even when their university has little visibility of the work. Policy alone may not bring those projects into an institutional service. The university must offer a reason to disclose the activity and a service that is easier and safer than managing it independently.

Financial incentives are part of that calculation. Jaci has seen universities deduct salary costs and overheads until the academic receives around 15% of the fee, despite completing the work during evenings or weekends. She argues that consultants should be able to retain 70%, 80%, or 90% of the income. They may choose to direct it into a university research account, but they should retain control over that decision.

Fair terms help the university build a more accurate picture of its external relationships. Departments can see which organisations their academics advise and connect that information with research projects or other forms of collaboration. Consulting activity that was previously invisible can then inform institutional relationship development.

Visibility to potential clients matters too. An organisation seeking specialist advice is more likely to search for an individual expert than approach a central office without a name. Academic profiles and university webpages should therefore explain the problems a person can address and state that they are open to consulting opportunities. The central service can then provide the structure that turns the enquiry into a well-scoped project.

Universities can also create roles with consulting as an explicit part of the workload. Jaci gives the example of a statistics department employing two people whose jobs included consultancy. In that model, the department can retain income because the institution has already allocated staff time to the activity.

Academic integrity protects the value of the advice

The university’s support must protect the independence that gives academic consulting its value. Jaci recalls a substantial project in which a client withheld the final payment because it disliked the academic’s conclusion. After reviewing the work, Oxford’s lawyer found that the academic had delivered the agreed report. The institution defended the consultant’s right to stand by the evidence.

Clear scoping helps prevent disputes by establishing what the client will receive. The consulting team may check whether a project has been completed, while responsibility for the professional judgement in the output stays with the academic. A client is purchasing expert advice, including the possibility that the conclusion will differ from the result it hoped to hear.

This principle will remain important as technology transfer becomes more complex. Universities increasingly work with venture builders, groups of academics, and stakeholders whose projects do not follow a simple sequence from invention disclosure to patent and licence. Formal intellectual property has less importance in some sectors, while knowledge, services, and relationships carry more of the value.

Understanding what the stakeholders need, and then putting something together that makes sense for everybody.

Academic consulting gives universities a flexible way to respond to that environment, provided they retain clear boundaries and realistic expectations. Jaci Barnett’s experience at Oxford University Innovation suggests that institutions will gain most when they make consulting easy to use, reward the academics doing the work, and preserve the independent judgement on which trusted advice depends.

Ready for more?

Academic consulting can turn university expertise into practical impact, strengthen external relationships, and open the door to longer-term research and innovation partnerships.

• Measuring what matters: The real impact of university–industry engagement explores how universities can look beyond patents, spin-outs, and commercial revenue to capture the wider value created through knowledge exchange, relationships, skills, and organisational change.Measuring the real impact of university-industry engagement
• Building strategic and sustainable university–industry partnerships examines how institutions can develop individual engagements into resilient, long-term partnerships supported by trust, shared purpose, and effective structures.

Stay tuned for the next episode on this series and don’t forget to follow us on your preferred podcast platform!